CCR Resolutions Database

Date
Filter by year and month (in format YYYY-MM)
  • Res.: 3
    Whereas:
    1. CIC changes the terms and conditions of temporary work permit programs every year;
    2. This information is not made available to NGOs or others that try to assist individuals on temporary work permits.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR demand that CIC to make any change in terms and conditions publicly available as soon as such changes are made.

  • Res.: 8
    Whereas:
    1. UNHCR’s stated mandate is to facilitate and support the voluntary repatriation of refugees in safety and dignity to their home countries when conditions within the country are sufficiently stable to sustain their return.
    2. The international community has strong interest involuntary repatriation as a durable solution for refugees
    3. The international community are donors of UNHCR and financially support its efforts.
    4. The levels of support to sustain persons during their repatriation process are grossly inadequate and do not provide the means forre-establishment. This is the situation for Sierra Leoneans currently repatriating.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR request the government of Canada to work with the UNHCR and other countries to increase the levels of support and security given to refugees repatriating through UNHCR initiatives.

  • Res.: 13
    Whereas:

    children of many refugee claimants, failed refugee claimants and children who are themselves refugee claimants or failed refugee claimants are unable to attend post secondary educational institutions while they or their parent(s) are awaiting a decision on an application to CIC due to the high cost of that education. These children are considered international students.

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the Governments of Canada and the Provinces to permit children of refugee claimants, failed refugee claimants and children who are themselves refugee claimants or failed refugee claimants awaiting decisions on applications to CIC and who are not removable, to attend Canadian schools and post secondary educational institutions at the same fees and requirements as Canadian residents.

  • Res.: 1
    Whereas:
    1. Government Assisted Refugees (GARs) represent one of the most important mechanisms for Canada to protect those refugees in need of protection;
    2. In recent years CIC has been selecting GARs on the basis of need rather than “ability to settle in Canada” which CCR warmly welcomes, which has resulted in increased demands on settlement agencies because of their very high needs;
    3. CIC has recently suggested that this increased demand on services can best be met by reducing the number of GARs.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR write to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration underlining our commitment to Government Assisted Refugees, and the principle of selection based on need, and requesting that the number of GARs NOT be reduced under any circumstances.

  • Res.: 6
    Whereas:
    1. Many refugees are people of colour who encounter systemic, institutional and financial barriers to full participation in CCR.
    2. Refugees and people of colour have played and continue to play a vital role in the CCR.
    3. The People of Colour Caucus provides a space where leadership by refugees and people of colour can be nurtured.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Officially recognize the People of Colour Caucus and provide a space for the caucus at all future consultations.
    2. Acknowledge and take practical steps to overcome the systemic barriers to full participation when planning future consultations.
  • Res.: 11
    Whereas:
    1. There are many protected persons who delay in applying for landing beyond the 180 days because of their inability to raise the $550 cost recovery fee, or other valid reasons;
    2. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration has not yet satisfactorily responded to the CCR request to eliminate the $550 processing fee for protected persons;
    3. The IP5 Guidelines state incorrectly that protected persons who apply late for landing and are being processed as humanitarian and compassionate cases, must meet all the normal admissibility criteria for immigrants, including medical, financial and identity document criteria.
    4. Protected persons who are being processed as H&C cases and who don’t have “satisfactory identity documents” are being refused landing.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That CCR request CIC to amend the IP5 Guidelines to correct this misunderstanding and to clarify that protected persons continue to be exempt from medical and financial criteria for landing and to benefit from other provisions to facilitate the landing of protected persons including special provisions for identity documents when the protected person is unable to obtain a passport to confirm identity.

  • Res.: 16
    Whereas:
    1. PRRA is not a substitute for an appeal on the merits of the case;
    2. The PRRA process is dysfunctional and demonstrates a lack of respect for international human rights norms and for the Suresh decision of the Supreme Court of Canada;
    3. There is inconsistent application by PRRA decision-makers in the consideration of what constitutes sufficient evidence and expert evidence.
    4. There are insufficient guidelines for PRRA decision-makers with respect to how they are to evaluate evidence.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Call on CIC to develop guidelines on what constitutes “sufficient” evidence for the purposes of PRRA decision-makers.
    2. Call on CIC to develop guidelines on what constitutes expert evidence or testimony for PRRA decision-makers.
    3. Propose that CIC form a consultative committee with CCR, other NGOs and lawyers to analyze and make recommendations on the PRRA system.
    4. Ask the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration to study the overall effectiveness of the PRRA process in light of Canada’s international human rights obligations.
  • Res.: 4
    Whereas:
    1. Workers on temporary work permits are not aware of their rights under the program and the charter;
    2. Many workers are not permitted by employers to retain their personal documentation such as passport, return air ticket and health card.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR demand that CIC and HRSDC:

    1. Ensure that temporary workers are fully informed of their rights under the program before or when they enter Canada;
    2. Ensure that temporary workers are given control of their own papers.
  • Res.: 9
    Whereas:
    1. The violence and lawlessness in Iraq continues to escalate and the possibility of a peaceful solution does not seem imminent,
    2. Many Canadian families have been impacted by resulting tragedies,
    3. Relatives and friends and former neighbours of Canadians are fleeing Iraq for Syria, Jordan and Turkey on a daily basis,
    4. They feel compelled to flee because a member of their family has already been targeted and killed, because they have received death threats, because their children have been kidnapped and held for ransom or because of vendettas in the context of lawlessness,
    5. The UNHCR has suspended Refugee Status Determination for Iraqis and
    6. Those who have sought asylum in Turkey, Syria and Jordan are struggling to meet their basic needs because they left their belongings behind and they are not allowed to work.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Urgently request the UNHCR to immediately:
      i)    Resume refugee status determination for Iraqis in the region,
      ii)    Provide care and support for Iraqis who have sought asylum in these countries,
      iii)    Dialogue with resettlement countries including Canada to implement resettlement as a solution for Iraqis in the region,
    2. Urge the Government of Canada to immediately:
      i)    Dialogue with the UNHCR to facilitate the resettlement of Iraqi refugees through the Private Sponsorship Program as well as the Government Assisted Refugee Program,
      ii)    Increase staff in the Damascus Visa Post to accommodate the increased need for resettlement from the region and to expedite cases already in process.
  • Res.: 14
    Whereas:
    1. PRRA and H&C applications are assessed by the same immigration officer in many cases;
    2. The grounds are to be considered under PRRA are different than H&C considerations.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR approach CIC to urge that H&C applications be assessed against the wider criteria of hardship, rather than risk as assessed in the PRRA.

  • Res.: 12
    Whereas:
    1. UNHCR recognizes voluntary repatriation as one of the three durable solutions and thus actively promotes it when and where conditions permit.
    2. These conditions must be not merely transient but fundamental such as the restoration and rehabilitation of infrastructure, restitution of land and lost property, and all other factors which make voluntary repatriation sustainable.
    3. It is crucial that refugees, including refugee women, have a say in all decisions and activities that affect them, including decisions and activities on voluntary repatriation.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR ask the Government of Canada to urge UNHCR to insist as a matter of principle in its discussions and negotiations with host governments and governments of countries of origin that refugees, especially refugee women, be included as active partners in the negotiation, planning and implementation of all voluntary repatriation processes.

  • Res.: 17
    Whereas:
    1. Everyone in Canada has a Charter right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression.
    2. Everyone in a state which has ratified the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has an obligation to promote those rights.
    3. The Québec Charter of Rights and Freedoms places a duty on everyone to protect the life of another.
    4. The government of Canada has failed to implement the appeal on the merits for refugee claimants, depriving refused claimants of an important safeguard contained in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
    5. The Canadian government has itself acknowledged problems with the refugee determination system, which it has claimed to have addressed with recent changes to the nomination process for IRB members and the introduction of regulations regarding immigration consultants.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Recognize that recourse to sanctuary may be necessary to protect asylum seekers whose lives or security would be jeopardized if removed from Canada.
    2. Deplore the recent, first-known, violation of sanctuary in Canada by police acting with force and in apparent close cooperation with CBSA and other government officials.
    3. When sanctuary is necessary, encourage those providing it to inform the CCR membership, so that members may assist in encouraging the government to reconsider the situation that leads to sanctuary.
    4. Take appropriate action to encourage the government to reconsider the situation that leads to sanctuary.
    5. Re-affirm the need for the implementation of the appeal on the merits for refused refugee claimants.
    6. Call upon the Canadian government to continue to respect the historic right of sanctuary.
  • Res.: 5
    Whereas:
    1. CIC has recently recognized and supported the need for additional language training for skilled immigrants, as demonstrated by the Enhanced Language Training (ELT) funding.
    2. CIC has greatly increased the arrivals of high-needs, low Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB)scoring government-assisted refugees (GARs).
    3. Research and experience clearly demonstrate that very low CLB literacy scoring newcomers require substantial additional instruction and support.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR request CIC to:

    1. Increase the hours of LINC eligibility for low literacy clients.
    2. Provide additional supports for programming targeting such clients over and above standard ESL provisions in the same manner as that for skilled immigrants under the ELT stream.
  • Res.: 10
    Whereas:
    1. There is a long, 2-3 year backlog of privately sponsored refugee applications.
    2. CCR adopted Res. 13, May 02 on long processing times.
    3. All government-assisted refugees (GARs) are now referred by the UNHCR (other than in source countries) and CCR has repeatedly been told that there are limited visa office resources.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR urge CIC to simplify the overseas refugee determination process, and to eliminate the perennial backlog by not re-interviewing UNHCR referred GARs, and through temporary staff re-deployments.

  • Res.: 15
    Whereas:
    1. Essential principles of access to refugee protection, due process, and fundamental justice are increasingly under attack in Canada and in other refugee-receiving countries.
    2. The government has indicated that it intends to reform the refugee determination process in Canada.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That:

    1. The draft Essential Principles, as amended by the Working Group on Inland Protection, be approved in principle as the present position of the CCR.
    2. The Executive of the CCR be empowered to revise and amend the draft Essential Principles, taking into account feedback from the membership, insofar as such revisions and amendments are in accord with the principles and policies of the CCR.
    3. The CCR publicize the Essential Principles and encourage its members to do likewise.
  • Res.: 20
    Whereas:
    1. In practice, Palestinian refugees are excluded from the mandate of the UNHCR in the host counties.
    2. UNRWA, unlike UNHCR, is not mandated to provide protection and security to Palestinian refugees under its administration.
    3. Palestinian refugees have lived without status or protection, often in refugee camps for over 56 years.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the Canadian government to urge the re-examination of UNHCR ’s responsibility toward Palestinian refugees, suggested by the second paragraph of Article 1(d), the so-called “exclusion clause”, and include the second paragraph in their statutes as a basis for extending human rights protection and inclusivity, thus affirming the intention of the 1951 Refugee Convention.

  • Res.: 3
    Whereas:
    1. 75% of GARs currently arriving in Canada have special needs.
    2. Settlement agencies and sponsors are not equipped to respond to these special needs.
    3. These special needs include urgent medical needs.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR urge CIC and MRCI to:

    1. Recognize the extent of these special needs and reflect this in the training and resourcing of federally funded settlement service providers and those funded through provincial partnerships or programs.
    2. Together with other relevant federal departments, provincial counterparts and educational institutions training health care providers, to seek ways to address the training needs of health providers with respect to refugee trauma and torture and cross-cultural awareness.
    3. Review the current RAP allocation model and upgrade dollars and timeframes to better support these special needs.
  • Res.: 8
    Whereas:
    1. There have been long-standing difficulties in obtaining exit permits from Turkey for privately sponsored refugees.
    2. CIC has decided unilaterally to close all current private sponsorship files, including cases which have already been accepted by the visa post to come to Canada.
    3. The Sponsorship Agreement states that the Private Sponsorship of Refugees Program “is a symbiotic partnership between SAHs and CIC wherein each relies on the other to fulfill their responsibilities in order for the program to succeed” and “the partnership … provides a framework where SAHs may collaborate with CIC to respond to special measures … and emergency situations” (Principles b and g).
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Urge CIC to keep all current private sponsorship files in Turkey open until all avenues have been pursued and until such time as an agreement can be reached with the SAH representatives, and to lift the ban on new undertakings, pending a solution(s) to the exit permit issues.
    2. Urge the government of Canada to continue working with the Multilateral Technical Committee to find a solution(s) to the current and future Turkish exit permit issues.
    3. Urge CIC to respect the terms of the SAH agreement (Principles b and g) and work in full collaboration with elected SAH representatives in further negotiations.
    4. Urge UNHCR to take proactive steps to assist in facilitating the departure from Turkey of persons accepted by the Canadian visa post.
  • Res.: 13
    Whereas:
    1. The news about torture, murders and disappearance of prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay by American and coalition forces has shocked the conscience of the world and has led to widespread reaction in the USA and elsewhere.
    2. An Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture, dealing with the mandate of the UN Committee against Torture to enter and monitor conditions in places of detention, has been adopted by the UN General Assembly and is ready for accession.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR write to the Prime Minister of Canada demanding that Canada:

    1. Make a public condemnation of torture in Iraq and Afghanistan by US and coalition forces, and ask for the US administration to:
      a) Adhere to the international legal instruments against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
      b) Train US military personnel and other enforcement official to adhere to these human rights standards.
      c) Allow outside inspection of US-controlled jails, detention centres and other facilities where persons are detained.
      d) Designate an independent ombudsperson to receive complains about torture and other human rights abuses.
    2. Accede to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and encourage other countries – including and especially the USA – to do the same.
  • Res.: 18
    Whereas:
    1. The current military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip violates a plethora of international human rights conventions which Canada has ratified.
    2. Palestinians living under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip are facing a humanitarian disaster.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the Canadian government to immediately place a moratorium on deportations to The Palestinian occupied territories, in recognition of the ongoing military occupation and the risk to the life, liberty and security of those living under it.

  • Res.: 1
    Whereas:
    1. CCR passed Resolution 19,Dec. 2000 on combating homophobia and heterosexism and Resolution 4, May1998 on the need to develop internal policies that affirm the rights of individuals.
    2. CCR should lead by example in combating homophobia and heterosexism in the CCR membership and the immigrant and refugee serving communities.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Develop an anti-homophobia and anti-heterosexism policy to present to its membership for endorsement at the Fall 2004 consultation.
    2. Ensure that this new policy and the existing anti-racism policy incorporate an integrated approach in implementation.
  • Res.: 6
    Whereas:

    The iCAMS system has been implemented across the country, and has proven to be a major burden to agencies, and cannot produce accurate and useful reports for either agencies or CIC.

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR write to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration insisting that CIC:

    1. Dedicate the necessary resources to bring the iCAMS system up to modern standards, so that: a) it will support database to database transfers, and b) allow for local reports production.
    2. Adjust the data collection points in consultation with the sector to bring them in line with the Accountability Framework, and to make the system’s use less burdensome for agencies.
  • Res.: 11
    Whereas:
    1. The problems with the IFH program have been mounting.
    2. The IFH Advisory Committee has become inactive.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR urge Medical Services Branch to mobilize the IFH Advisory Committee to develop solutions to: a) registration problems b) the complex claim process c) the slow reimbursement scheme d) inadequate resources for increasing special needs.

  • Res.: 16
    Whereas:
    1. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations state that the Minister can suspend removals to a country or place where there is a situation of generalized risk.
    2. Where there is no functioning government, civilians are at generalized risk.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the Canadian government to add countries that are without a functioning government, like Somalia, to the list of countries to which Canada has temporarily suspended removals.

  • Res.: 21
    Whereas:
    1. There is demonstrable confusion within IRB and PRRA regarding the status of stateless Palestinian refugees, and the conditions they have fled.
    2. This lack of understanding has led to inconsistent and ill-informed decision-making.
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That CCR, together with other organizations and coalitions working for the rights of Palestinian refugees, raise with the IRB and with PRRA officials the need for better and more consistent information regarding the legal status of Palestinian refugees and the rights violations they face.