CCR Resolutions Database

Date
Filter by year and month (in format YYYY-MM)
  • Res.: 1
    Whereas:
    1. Civic participation, including taking out citizenship, being aware of political issues and voting, is key to full participation in Canadian society;
    2. Political representation seems to be lagging behind demographic change;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR urge its members to:

    1. Actively encourage more civic participation by immigrants and refugees;
    2. Explore the development of programming to facilitate this goal.
  • Res.: 6
    Whereas:
    1. Convention refugees who have not been landed are living permanently in Canada;
    2. Access to higher education is a key to Canadian life and economic independence;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Write to the minister of Human Resources Development Canada urging him to amend the Canada Student Loans Act to include Convention Refugees in their eligibility criteria;
    2. Urge its members to raise this issue with their local Members of Parliament;
    3. Encourage provincial governments to:

      a) advocate this change with the Federal government;

      b) make the same change in their provincial legislation.

  • Res.: 11
    Whereas:
    1. The CCR has passed an earlier resolution that the Right of Landing Fee is discriminatory, exclusionary and racist because of the vast variance in country and individual income around the world, and is particularly burdensome for refugees;
    2. Previous to 1995 refugees were not charged interest on transportation loans, admissibility loans and assistance loans;
    3. The interest rate charged is above prime rate;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Continue to call for a repeal of the Right of Landing Fee for all newcomers accepted for landing in Canada;
    2. Insist that no interest be charged on any immigration loans;
    3. Urge the government, pending legislation to repeal interest charges, to charge no more than the prime rate.
  • Res.: 16
    Whereas:

    The nomination process and the renewal of mandates at the IRB do not have the confidence of the legal and human rights communities;

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Call for a moratorium on nominations and non-renewals until a fair process can be instituted.
    2. Ask the Parliamentary Committee on Citizenship and Immigration to hold hearings on these issues.
  • Res.: 4
    Whereas:
    1. Immigrants and refugees are coming to this country with qualifications and professional skills that are needed in Canada;
    2. Many newcomers have been denied access to their professions or trades because of inflexible accreditation bodies;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the federal and provincial governments to ensure that there is a fair process whereby newcomers can gain recognition of the skills they acquired elsewhere and have:

    1. access to training to meet Canadian standards;
    2. a right of appeal from denial of such recognition or access.
  • Res.: 9
    Whereas:
    1. General Augusto Pinochet is presently detained in the United Kingdom pending extradition proceeding initiated by Spain, France and Switzerland;
    2. General Pinochet's 1973 coup d'état against Chile's democratically elected government and the brutal dictatorship which he directed until 1990 was responsible for the deaths and/or disappearance of more than 3,000 Chileans and others, the torture and imprisonment of many thousands more and the forced exile of still more thousands to many countries including Canada;
    3. Applications have been made to the government of Canada by a Canadian citizen who was detained and tortured in Chile in October 1973, as well as by a number of Canadian citizens of Chilean origin who experienced severe abuses throughout the Pinochet years, for the prosecution and extradition of General Pinochet;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Send congratulations to the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords on their historic decision upholding the primacy of human rights over state rights;
    2. Send a message to the United Kingdom Home Secretary urging him to uphold the primacy of human rights over political considerations and to allow the extradition proceedings against General Pinochet to go ahead, or prosecute him in Great Britain for his crimes against humanity, and request the government of Canada to send a similar message;
    3. Urge the government of Canada to institute criminal proceedings against General Pinochet in the above mentioned cases and request his extradition from the United Kingdom to Canada.
  • Res.: 14
    Whereas:
    1. The CCR is concerned that the drive for efficiency at the CRDD is resulting in the denial of the right of claimants to full and fair hearings;
    2. The CCR is concerned about allegations of bias by members at the CRDD in their rendering of decisions in claims based on sexual orientation;
    3. The CCR is concerned that the inability of lawyers to obtain conventional tape recordings of CRDD hearings is placing obstacles in the way of a claimant's right and a lawyer's ability to apply properly for leave to commence judicial review proceedings at the federal court;
    4. The CCR is concerned about the misconduct by RCOs during refugee claim hearings;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR write to the chairperson of the IRB to express our concerns and request action on the above issues.

  • Res.: 19
    Whereas:
    1. François Crépeau and France Houle have prepared a report entitled Compétence et Indépendance, dated 6 March 1998 which makes seven key recommendations on the IRB appointments process;
    2. The report was endorsed by CCR's IRB workshop in Ottawa on 28 November 1998;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR endorse and promote the recommendations of the report on the appointments process.

  • Res.: 2
    Whereas:
    1. The settlement agencies of Ontario have been living with uncertainty since the introduction of "Settlement Renewal" three years ago;
    2. The Ontario Government does not appear to want the responsibility of settlement;
    3. Clients' needs are best served by stable agencies which are focused on client service;
    4. Many of the practices of Ontario Region are inconsistent with the practices of other CIC regions;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Write to CIC National Headquarters asking that:

      a)The Federal Government cease active pursuit of negotiations on settlement renewal with the government of Ontario;

      b)CIC Ontario Region proceed as if settlement renewal will not go forward.

    2. Suggest that CIC improve their management of ISAP, Host and LINC contracts by:
      • Reducing the micro management of contracts, by, among other things, moving from monthly to quarterly reporting and by being more flexible and, at a minimum, implementing the ISAP Handbook which states that "you may shift funds from one cost category to another without prior approval";
      • Respecting agencies' difficulties with cashflow and interest charges by systematically making reasonable advances of funds;
      • Paying salary and administrative costs, including benefits, at a just level of remuneration across the country;
      • Seeking substantive agency input into all of the above.
  • Res.: 7
    Whereas:
    1. All Canadian passport holders are equal regardless of country of origin;
    2. Canadian passport and travel document holders have suffered violations of their human rights by foreign governments at foreign ports of entry on the basis of their country of origin;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call upon the Canadian government to ensure that foreign governments treat all Canadian citizens equally.

  • Res.: 12
    Whereas:
    1. Some countries interpret the Refugee Convention in a narrow and technical manner denying effective protection to refugees;
    2. Canadian visa officers sometimes show too much deference to the decisions of tribunals of other countries which have refused refugee claims which under the Canadian interpretation of the Convention would be accepted;
    3. Canada's visa offices are inconsistent in their efforts to establish meaningful channels of communication with local and Canadian NGOs involved in resettlement;
    4. Canada has failed to put in place meaningful review of negative decisions despite a refusal rate significantly higher than other resettlement countries;
    5. Applicants for resettlement from some countries are deported from those countries despite having applications for resettlement to Canada pending, particularly in light of the frequent long processing times for such applications;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Call on the appropriate departments of the Government of Canada to:

       

      a)remind visa offices of the often broader interpretation of the Refugee Convention in Canadian law than that demonstrated by some other countries, particularly with respect to the absence of a requirement for persecution to be at the hands of the state;

      b)ensure that in cases where the applicant does not meet the Convention definition but has a private sponsorship that the relatively broader provisions of the Asylum Class are thoroughly considered;

      c)strengthen and regularize consultation between visa offices and local and Canadian NGOs involved in resettlement;

      d)establish and implement a meaningful review of negative decisions on resettlement cases similar to that recently adopted by US INS;

    2. Call on the Government of Canada to play a prominent role in convincing other governments to interpret the Convention in a broad manner;
    3. Ask the Government of Canada to urge other governments to allow applicants for resettlement in Canada to remain in their countries of asylum pending determination of their applications by Canada.
  • Res.: 17
    Whereas:
    1. Canada has suspended deportations to Algeria, Democratic Republic of Congo (ex-Zaire), Afghanistan, Rwanda, & Burundi;
    2. CIC does not consider this policy to cover removals to third countries, principally the United States;
    3. A significant numbers of claimants arrive at Canadian border points via the United States, often as a result of Canadian interdiction practices;
    4. A growing number of refused refugee claimants face an imminent danger of being removed to the United States, a country which at present has no suspension of deportations to the above-named countries;
    5. The CCR has written several times to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, in the spring and summer of 1998, asking her to suspend removals of these individuals to the United States;
    6. CIC has to date maintained its policy;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Continue to energetically oppose, by all means possible, the implementation of this policy;
    2. Prepare a letter and information kit which CCR members can use to lobby their M.P.s, and to mobilize support from other organizations involved in human rights work.
  • Res.: 5
    Whereas:
    1. Acquisition of language is key to the educational process;
    2. Adequate language funding in the school system is important to the future success of immigrant and refugee children;
    3. Current Ontario government policy only allow for three years of language support from the time of arrival in Canada;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR write to the Ontario Ministry of Education urging that eligibility for funding for language support:

    1. be extended to at least five years;
    2. be measured relative to the students' arrival in the Ontario school system to allow for adequate support for Canadian born children who start school without English skills and to allow for secondary migration from Quebec.
  • Res.: 10
    Whereas:
    1. The Canadian Council for Refugees has promoted the involvement of NGOs in the identification of refugees overseas;
    2. Citizenship and Immigration Canada`s refugee resettlement model proposes the involvement of NGOs as overseas service partners;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR adopt as its position its paper Conditions for the Involvement of NGOs as Overseas Service Partners.

  • Res.: 15
    Whereas:
    1. The Immigration and Refugee Board has begun to conduct refugee hearings using video-conferencing whereby IRB members in one city conduct hearings on claimants in another city;
    2. The IRB has done no analysis of the impact of such video-conference hearings on the ability of claimants to have a fair hearing;
    3. The use of video-conference hearings is contrary to the IRB's own stated policy of making the setting of refugee claims less intimidating and less formal;
    4. The use of video-conferencing for refugee hearings is a denial of due process to refugee claimants;
    5. Videoconferencing is also being used in detention reviews, similarly compromising the rights of detainees to a fair hearing;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call upon the IRB to immediately stop the use of video-conferencing for the conducting of refugee claim hearings and detention reviews.

  • Res.: 20
    Whereas:

    There have been numerous formal and informal complaints about the IRB procedures and members have not been treated seriously;

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR ask that the mandate of Mr Ratushny be expanded to include the complaints process and violations of fundamental rights in all of the CRDD's regions, the details of which are to be provided by the Working Group on Refugee Protection.

  • Res.: 15
    Whereas:
    1. Board members are under pressure to move quickly on cases at the expense of fairness, thus violating the fundamental right of refugee claimants to a fair and impartial hearing;
    2. The Montreal IRB has started giving negative decisions with no credible basis in a systematic and abusive fashion;
    3. There is a serious problem with Board members not treating fairly victims of torture and a general problem of insensitivity linked to a lack of proper training for Board members;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Express our opposition to increased findings of no credible basis in Montreal and call on the IRB to cease abusive use of such findings.
    2. Request training of IRB members with the active involvement of the UNHCR, the Canadian Bar, the CCR and other appropriate NGOs. This training must include sensitivity training on treatment of torture victims, a code of ethics for Board members and training on the rules of fundamental justice.
  • Res.: 3
    Whereas:

    There is a need to share information on services for refugee claimants and to explore how the work can be improved and better communication networks established across the country;

    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the Executive of the CCR give priority consideration to establishing an ad hoc joint committee (Settlement/Protection) to deal with the issues of services to refugee claimants.

  • Res.: 8
    Whereas:
    1. Human rights violations in Guatemala have increased significantly since the April 1998 assassination of Bishop Juan Gerardi Conedera two days after he presented the report of the Interdiocesan Project to Recover the Historical Memory (REMHI) which named some of the perpetrators involved in torture, killings, massacres and disappearances;
    2. The REMHI report not only documents 55,021 cases of victims, holding the Guatemalan Army and paramilitary squads responsible for 85.4% of the crimes and the insurgency responsible for 9.3% of those crimes, but also exposes the way the repressive apparatus operates allowing powerful perpetrators of human rights violations to continue to act with impunity;
    3. Luis Yat, indigenous mayor of El Quiche was assassinated in front of his wife and children last May 6 and numerous members of indigenous, women's and human rights organizations continue to be threatened and intimidated;
    4. The Inter-American Human Rights Commission of the Organization of American States (OAS) requested the Guatemalan State to provide protective measures for 110 members of REMHI and workers at the Human Rights Office of the Catholic Archdiocese who are at risk;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Write to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and ask that the number of government-assisted refugees from Guatemala be increased and that she direct her department to take note of the worsening human rights situation in Guatemala when considering risk assessments, humanitarian and compassionate applications and deferring removals.
    2. Write to the government of Guatemala to demand that they protect the 110 members of REMHI and workers at the Human Rights Office of the Catholic Archdiocese.
    3. Write to the Minister of Foreign Affairs asking him to protest to the Guatemalan government at the murder of Bishop Juan Gerardi Conedera and to pressure the Guatemalan government to protect the REMHI members and Human Rights Office workers.
  • Res.: 13
    Whereas:
    1. There are Convention Refugees, particularly Iranians, who have applied for landing and had CSIS interviews but have had their landing held up for years in the Security Reviews in case management;
    2. They are unable to travel outside Canada, sponsor family or pursue post-secondary education;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That CCR request a meeting between CIC and the CCR and affected communities to discuss landing delays for security reasons.

  • Res.: 18
    Whereas:
    1. The scourge of torture continues throughout the world;
    2. There is an urgent need to raise public awareness in Canada about torture;
    3. The UN General Assembly has proclaimed June 26, 1998 as the International Day in support of Victims of Torture;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call upon the government of Canada to endorse the UN decision by declaring June 26 as the Canadian Day in support of survivors of torture.

  • Res.: 1
    Whereas:
    1. The Canadian Council for Refugees recognizes that racism is systemic in Canadian society. It causes pain, humiliation and has far-reaching consequences. It is embedded in society and social institutions in a way that is so pervasive that it is often invisible;
    2. The Anti-Racism Policy of the Canadian Council for Refugees was adopted on November 24th, 1996 by its members who have recognized that racism prevents equality in opportunity and access to asylum, immigration opportunities, education, jobs, housing, health care and social services, and limits participation in decision-making bodies;
    3. The CCR acknowledges its commitment to promote anti-racism principles and practices among its member organizations;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR urge all its member groups to adopt the following convention:

    As a member of the Canadian Council for Refugees, our organization:

    1. Commits itself to facilitating the elimination of racism and all forms of discrimination by working towards the identification and elimination of the barriers that prevent refugees and immigrants from participating in Canadian society;
    2. Commits itself to ensuring that the principles of equality, equity for all races, languages, faiths and cultures are reflected in our organization's policies, procedures and relations with staff, members and the society. It is our responsibility to ensure that the communities that we serve and members of our organization see themselves valued and reflected within the organization;
    3. Undertakes to develop and implement an anti-racism policy;
    4. Fosters an environment that is free of racism, sexism, discrimination and bias where all individuals are treated with respect and dignity;
    5. Seeks opportunities for training and education in anti-racism for our staff, volunteers and Board;
    6. Provides opportunities for refugees, immigrants and people of colour to be represented when selecting participants for meetings (e.g. CCR conferences) and when organizing events;
    7. Recognizes the importance of public education about why Canada must protect refugees and welcome immigrants. This work may be undertaken through active media work, through public education programs and through making positive information on refugees and immigrants readily available and accessible.
  • Res.: 6
    Whereas:
    1. The violation of human rights in Colombia has reached unprecedented and outrageous levels;
    2. The targets of this violence are key institutions of civil society (human rights groups; church, justice and peace groups; workers and trade union leaders; peasant and indigenous organizations);
    3. The Colombian government has proven, once again, to be unwilling and incapable of curbing the atrocities committed by the military and especially the paramilitary formations;
    4. An estimated one million Colombians are internally displaced within the country;
    5. Colombia was added to the Source Country list this year;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Demand that the Government of Canada put special emphasis immediately on Colombian nationals at risk of human rights violations, including expediting the processing of persons applying through the Humanitarian Designated (Source Country) class;
    2. Urge the Government of Canada to strongly condemn the serious and escalating human rights violations in Colombia in all international and regional fora and in particular:
      a) request the UN Human Rights Commission convene a special session on Colombia;
      b) raise concerns about Colombia at the next meeting of the OAS general assembly;
    3. Urge the Government of Canada to cease all sales of military equipment to Colombia, including all "dual purpose" equipment that could have military application.
  • Res.: 11
    Whereas:
    1. The CCR has prepared a position paper which was submitted to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration's consultations on Legislative Review;
    2. The Minister has not committed to consultations on forthcoming draft legislation before tabling;
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR:

    1. Adopt as policy the contents of the position paper prepared for the Minister's consultations on legislative review;
    2. Press the Minister for further broad consultations on proposed changes resulting from the legislative review, before the drafting of legislation.
  • Res.: 16
    Whereas:
    1. Gay men and lesbians are recognized as a particular social group by the federal court;
    2. Gay men and lesbians are protected from discrimination under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;
    3. Most Canadian provinces currently recognize gay and lesbian relationships as legally equal to heterosexual relationships;
    4. The CCR has adopted a resolution on "Guidelines and Education on Sexual Orientation for the IRB" (Res 16, Nov 94);
    Therefore be it resolved:

    That the CCR call on the federal government to:

    1. Grant equal legal status to same-sex relationships within the Family Class as is currently given heterosexual relationships;
    2. Exempt refugees from rejection on the basis of medical inadmissibility, particularly gays and lesbians with HIV/AIDS;
    3. Extend full and equal protection to people fleeing persecution based on sexual orientation at visa offices;
    4. Waive the one-year cohabitation requirement for overseas sponsorship of a same-sex partner and to substitute it with an appropriate non-discriminatory alternative.