Skip to main content

Detention

Detention on the basis of identity

Resolution number
10
Whereas

Persons of certain countries of origin such as Pakistan and some African states appear to be detained on the basis of identity for extended periods;

Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR call on CIC to:

  1. Research the length of time it takes those detained on the basis of identity to obtain release;
  2. Report the data by country of origin;
  3. Make public the findings.
Working Group
Subject

Bonds required for refugee claimants in Toronto and elsewhere

Resolution number
17
Whereas
  1. The majority of refugee claimants in detention in Toronto and elsewhere are required to pay a bond to be released;
  2. Most refugee claimants do not have friends or relatives to pay the bond;
  3. The bail program in Toronto is very slow and does not accept all claimants.
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR ask CIC and the IRB to release refugee claimants who satisfy their identity requirements, without a bond.

Working Group
Subject

Detention on grounds of ID

Resolution number
16
Whereas
  1. Many refugee claimants lack identity documents upon arrival;
  2. International standards stipulate that people must not be penalized for lack of ID;
  3. International guidelines on detention stipulate that undocumented refugee claimants should not normally be detained;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR call on the government of Canada (CIC and IRB) to adhere to international standards with respect to detention of refugee claimants, and to ensure that refugee claimants not be detained for more time than is required to conduct initial enquiries as to the person's identity. Ascertaining a person's identity should not be dependent on an ability to produce an identity document.

Working Group
Subject

Access to counsel for immigration detainees

Resolution number
15
Whereas

The increasing use of detention by CIC in provincial jails has resulted in the transfer of immigration detainees to remote areas, where they are effectively denied the right to counsel and cannot even contact counsel due to the requirement to communicate via collect calls from these jails;

Therefore be it resolved

That CCR call upon the federal and provincial governments to establish procedures to ensure effective access to counsel for all immigration detainees, including free telephone access and face to face communication with counsel.

Working Group
Subject

Detention on identity grounds

Resolution number
5
Whereas
  1. According to IRPA, there is no independent review of:
    a) the decision of an officer to detain a foreign national because their identity has not been established.
    b) the Minister’s opinion that identity has not been established.
    c) once identity has been tendered, the decision that it is insufficient;
  2. According to international human rights law, detention without independent review constitutes arbitrary detention;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR demand that IRPA be amended to require that the Immigration Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board conduct an independent review of 1 a), b) and c).

Working Group
Subject

NGO access to detention centres

Resolution number
12
Whereas
  1. NGO access to CBSA Immigration Detention Facilities is necessary;
  2. NGO access has become increasingly difficult given strict requirements for security clearance;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR demand that NGOs that visit or provide services within immigration detention facilities not be required to pass security clearance

Working Group
Subject

Detention of minors – presumption of age

Resolution number
14
Whereas
  1. Detention is a recourse of last resort;
  2. Detention of minors must be an exceptional measure;
  3. The best interests of the child must be taken into consideration by the government and its tribunals;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR recommend that, when a person who alleges to be a minor is detained for reasons of identity, they must be presumed to be a minor, until otherwise established.

Working Group

Children in Detention

Resolution number
13
Whereas
  1. Section 60 of IRPA says that detention of children should be a measure of last resort;
  2. Regulation 249 obliges the consideration of alternatives to detention where children are concerned;
  3. The Convention on the Rights of the Child obliges Canada to give primary consideration to the best interests of the child;
  4. Children are held in detention centres in Canada either because they are detained or because they are accompanying their detained guardians;
  5. CBSA and IRB do not give primary consideration to best interests of the child in their decision-making with regards to detention of children;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR demand that:

  1. CBSA not detain children by considering all possible alternatives;
  2. IRB and CBSA respect their obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and give primary consideration to the best interests of the child when making decisions on detention of children or of adult guardians of children, which affects their children.
Working Group

Detention of non-status persons

Resolution number
10
Whereas
  1. There are a large number of persons without status who have submitted different forms of requests to regularize their situation;
  2. The main way to ask for a decision on humanitarian grounds or other grounds while a person is underground and the subject of an arrest warrant is to present themselves to the Canadian authorities;
  3. People without status who present themselves to the Canadian authorities in order to regularize their status are often detained;
Therefore be it resolved

That the CCR advocate with the Minister of Public Safety, CBSA, and the Immigration and Refugee Board that persons presenting themselves voluntarily for regularization should benefit from a favourable presumption that they do not normally represent a flight risk and that they therefore should not be detained.

Working Group