CCR Resolutions Database

1. Canada issued over 87,000 temporary work permits last year;
2. People living on temporary work permits are often in precarious and unstable situations;
3. Many people living on work permits will eventually become landed in Canada;
4. People living on temporary work permits are all contributing community members and paying taxes;

1. CCR is celebrating 25 years of private sponsorship in Canada;
2. Canada's resettlement targets, including for private sponsorship, have largely remained unchanged for the past 10 years, even though overall immigration targets have increased;
3. An increase in overall resettlement targets reflects a commitment to refugee resettlement and may lead to an increase in resource allocation to resettlement processing.
4. CCR has consistently maintained the three principles of private sponsorship; partnership, additionality and naming;

1. Canada is a party to the Palermo Protocol;
2. CCR passed Resolution 24 in December 2001 and subsequently has held regional workshops and a national conference to explore the issues domestically.
3. It was identified that a serious barrier exists for trafficked persons, in particular women and children, seeking assistance due to lack of access to legal status in Canada;

1. All protected persons, including children, applying as principal applicants for permanent residents must pay the $550 processing fee within180 days;
2. This $550 fee is a significant and sometimes insurmountable barrier for many protected persons;
3. In 1994 the CCR adopted a resolution condemning all cost-recovery fees for landing applications for refugees and their dependants;

1. The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has noted with concern in its recent report on Canada that the "best interests" principle as a primary consideration in all decisions affecting children is not being observed by administrative and judicial authorities in many areas, including in decisions on deportation;
2. The CCR adopted a resolution in November 2002 calling for guidelines on the best interests of the child;

1. Youth comprise a significant and often overlooked portion of the population.
2. Youth are the leaders of tomorrow;

1. The government of Canada made a commitment to Canadians for efficient program management in the document "Results for Canadians";
2. The government of Canada made a commitment to the Voluntary Sector for rational reporting systems in the Voluntary Sector Accord and its Code of Good Practice on Funding;
3. LINC providers in Ontario are being forced into a triple reporting structure because CIC's two computer systems, the regional ARS and the national iCAMS, are incompatible and unreliable;
4. ISAP providers in Ontario are being forced into double reporting because NHQ and Ontario Region do not have the same reporting requirements;
5. Both LINC and ISAP providers are forced to input large amounts of client data into systems with no capacity to assist program management;
6. CIC provides no realistic support for this administrative burden;

1. Stateless people are in a vulnerable situation because they have no protection from a state;
2. IRPA does not specify stateless persons as a group needing protection or eligible for landing on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.

1. The majority of refugee claimants in detention in Toronto and elsewhere are required to pay a bond to be released;
2. Most refugee claimants do not have friends or relatives to pay the bond;
3. The bail program in Toronto is very slow and does not accept all claimants.

1. The Montreal Immigration and Refugee Board has been routinely refusing to grant any change of venue to refugee claimants despite proof of hardship;
2. The refusals of requests for changes of venue have caused hardships for refugee claimants;

Recent family court decisions in B.C. and Ontario have provided that a child who comes under the jurisdiction of the Hague Convention and who is a refugee claimant in Canada could be returned to the country where she fears persecution prior to a determination of the refugee claim;

1. The CCR is concerned globally with the plight of refugees and refugee welfare in their area or place of refuge;
2. Financial assistance provided by CIDA multilaterally to UN agencies and other coordinating bodies does not always result in improving the actual provision of material assistance (food, water, shelter, non-food items, etc.) to refugees;

1. The IRB is denying extensions of time for filing PIFs and where extensions are granted they are for 1-2 weeks maximum;
2. This does not allow for difficulties claimants experience when they:
   a)are detained; b)require translation (language issues);
   c)require an experienced counsel (e.g. gender, sexual orientation);
   d)face delays in obtaining legal aid;
   e)reside in smaller centres with no easy access to counsel;
   f)are survivors of torture and trauma;
3. The IRB is declaring abandonment even where a claimant has produced a PIF and has a reasonable explanation for the delay;

1. Young people are under-represented in the CCR;
2. There are increasing numbers of separated children and youth coming to Canada;
3. In order to remain relevant to immigrants and refugees, the CCR must find ways to increase youth participation;

1. The Government of Sri Lanka and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have agreed on a cessation of hostilities and began peace negotiations to end almost two decades of civil war;
2. Sri Lankan Tamil refugees living in refugee camps in India met in February 2003 to discuss the peace process and agree on principles for their possible return home;
3. The refugees have come out with a Memorandum of Concern stating that their return home should be "safe, orderly and as a consequence of a peace process that is transparent, democratic and inclusive with a visible commitment to protecting the rights of all Ceylon's citizens and the restoration of their social and material well-being";
4. The refugees have asked for international support of their principles of return;
5. The principles of return as outlined in the Nallayan Declaration Memorandum of Concern are in line with CCR concerns that refugees have a say in decisions impacting on their lives;

1. Permanent residents, protected persons and citizens have the right to establish a longstanding relationship by co-habiting with or marrying a partner of their choice and have children, regardless of status;
2. Families are a key foundation of civil society and every effort should be taken to ensure that partners and their offspring are not separated;

The on-going humanitarian and human insecurity problems continue to plague Iraqis displaced inside or outside the country;

1. People of Arab descent and Muslims of various ethnicities are experiencing being the target of increased discrimination, harassment and racialization following the events of September 11, 2001;
2. Many such victims are reticent out of fear of making public such targeting;
3. There is a need to broaden public awareness of what is happening in our communities concerning this targeting;

1. Undocumented/non-status immigrants and refugees who have been living without status in Canada have made and continue to make vital contributions to our society;
2. They have been denied access to basic social supports, health services and educational opportunities;
3. They are exploited and marginalized because of lack of status;
4. The rights of the children of undocumented/non-status immigrants and refugees, including those who are Canadian-born, are often violated and they and their parents have no recourse because they are fearful of being deported;
5. An increasingly restrictive Canadian immigration policy serves as a prohibitive barrier to equitable access to immigration to Canada;
6. In the past the Canadian Government has instituted special programs to regularize the status of such persons without status;
7. A just and humane solution must be sought to address the problem of the large numbers of undocumented/non-status immigrants and refugees in the country;

CCR Resolution 8, Nov. 1993 called for physical protection of refugee women in Africa and Resolution 17, June 1994 called for women at risk to have interviews waived;

1. The CCR passed a resolution in November 1994 on guidelines and education on sexual orientation for the IRB (Res. 16);
2. There continues to be a lack of familiarity and sensitivity to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual (LGBT) issues and realities amongst some members of the IRB, RPOs and CIC employees as well as a continuing attitude of homophobia and heterosexism;
3. Members are using the existence of LGBT organizations in the country of origin as evidence of acceptance in the country of origin;
4. Members are using tourist promotional materials directed at LGBT North American communities as evidence of acceptance;
5. Members incorrectly assume that there are no human rights abuses and therefore consider there is evidence of acceptance, in situations where both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are silent on specific countries;
6. Some members state that claimants will experience no problems if they behave in a discreet manner in their country of origin;

1. We are witnessing a significant increase in the number of immigrants recently, and trends indicate that this will likely continue for years to come;
2. We see a significant increase in costs to deliver settlement services, due to increases in rents and other infrastructure costs, increased staff compensation levels, etc;

1. CCR Resolution 39, June 1994 condemned cost recovery fees for Convention refugees and their dependants and requested that processing fees be eliminated for refugees and CCR Resolution 12, May 1995, called the Right of Landing Fee discriminatory, exclusionary and racist and called for the repeal of the Right of Landing Fee for all newcomers to Canada while recognizing the particular burden the head tax laid on refugees;
2. CIC is likely to implement a "user pay" cost recovery fee to pay organizations abroad who are contracted to refer and/or process refugees for resettlement to Canada. The cost recovery mechanism will create additional debt burdens for refugees resettled to Canada;
3. The cost recovery mechanism creates a two-tier system for refugees seeking resettlement because neither sponsors nor UNHCR charge fees to refugees for referral;

1. The CCR passed a resolution to endorse the "Best Practice" Statement developed by the Focal Point on Separated Children (Res. 19, Nov. 2002);
2. There has yet to be a national policy developed on separated children;
3. There is no consistent definition of the term "separated children";
4. Practices differ widely across the country;

The provision of services of a certain quality is a social responsibility for agencies providing services to refugee and immigrant clients;