
CANADIAN
COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES
RESOLUTIONS
NOVEMBER 2006
IMMIGRATION AND SETTLEMENT
1.
Youth Inclusion
WHEREAS: The CCR
recognizes the value
of the participation and perspective of youth;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the CCR:
1.
Support the development of the CCR Youth Network
and increasing
meaningful youth engagement and leadership within the CCR.
2.
Add youth to the list of factors to be taken into
account by
the members of the CCR in the election of Executive Committee members.
OVERSEAS PROTECTION AND
SPONSORSHIP
2.
Interpreters at visa offices
WHEREAS: Recent
information from various sources and complaints from refugees
interviewed by
the Damascus and other visa posts suggest that some refusals may be due
to
interpretation;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the CCR urge CIC to review increasingly serious
concerns
around interpretation at interviews, including allegations of bias, and
ask
that standards be adopted to ensure quality of interpretation.
3.
Liberian Refugees in West Africa
WHEREAS: 1.
The situation in Liberia is in transition
and is improving;
2. The
country is not able to absorb big numbers of returnees;
3. Human
rights are not generally respected;
4. Repatriation
is not a durable solution for
all Liberian refugees in the region and some may meet the Country of
Asylum
Class criteria;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR:
1.
Urge CIC to consider resettlement of Liberians to
Canada for
whom repatriation is not the preferred option and as part of a broader
effort
to achieve durable solutions for all Liberian refugees in West Africa;
2.
Ask CIC to consult with interested NGOs in Canada
regarding
resettlement to Canada of Liberian refugees in West Africa;
3.
Encourage CIC to review sponsorship cases rejected
in 2006 if
the refugees live in camp-based situations and were rejected on the
basis that
repatriation is available to them;
4.
Request UNHCR to stop reducing financial support
to the
refugees in Buduburam Camp and restore the assistance to the past year
level;
5.
Request CIDA to become actively involved in the
post-war
reconstruction in Liberia.
4.
War in the Horn of Africa
WHEREAS:
1. The possibility
of a
war is looming in the
Horn of Africa due to political intervention and ambition by the
governments of
Ethiopia and Eritrea in the civil war in Somalia;
2. Many
innocent people, mainly women and
children, are already displaced and on the move to other neighbouring
countries, such as Kenya, which already houses many refugees;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR ask the Canadian
government to collaborate with the African Union to achieve a more
humane
approach to diplomacy in the Horn of Africa and to use unilateral,
bilateral,
regional and multilateral means to apply pressure on:
1.
The Ethiopian government to withdraw its soldiers
from Somalia
and to refrain from further escalating the tension by dragging people
into war;
2.
The Eritrean government to stop trying to wage
their conflict
with Ethiopia in Somalia.
INLAND PROTECTION
5.
Detention on identity grounds
WHEREAS:
1.
According to IRPA,
there is no independent review of:
a)
the
decision of an officer to detain a foreign national because their
identity has
not been established;
b)
the
Minister’s opinion that identity has not been established;
c)
once
identity has been tendered, the decision that it is insufficient;
2. According
to international human rights
law, detention without independent review constitutes arbitrary
detention;
THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the CCR demand that IRPA be amended to require
that the
Immigration Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board conduct an
independent review of 1 a), b) and c).
6.
Migrant agricultural workers and other
temporary work
permit holders
WHEREAS:
1. Migrant
agricultural
workers and other
temporary work permit holders are living in a situation of segregation
which
prevents them from having effective recourse to justice;
2. Migrant
workers who have suffered an
injustice are often deported before they can seek a legal recourse;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR demand that the status
of worker be maintained during the period necessary to seize a tribunal
of the
matter and to await its resolution.
7.
Torture legislation
WHEREAS: 1. The Arar Commission
has identified
Canadian complicity in Maher Arar’s rendition to torture in Syria;
2. The
Canadian government continues to argue
that there may be circumstances under which individuals could be
returned to a
country where there may be grounds to believe they may be at risk of
torture;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:
1.
The CCR call on the government to enact
legislation that
unequivocally and absolutely prohibits the use of torture under any
circumstances by any person, but in particular by any government
official or
persons acting in a government-related capacity;
2.
This legislation prohibit the use of information
garnered as a
result of torture;
3.
This legislation prohibit actions, including the
sharing of
information, that might reasonably be expected to place any person at
risk of
torture.
8.
Automatic issuance of “protected
status”
documents
WHEREAS:
1. It is important
for
protected persons to
settle meaningfully in Canada through education, employment, etc.;
2. Presently,
protected persons need to
submit a special “protected status” document to be registered in
certain
programs;
3. It
takes
8 weeks for CIC to issue these
documents;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR call on CIC to issue
“protected status” documents at the time the person is accepted by the
IRB.
9.
Arming of border guards
WHEREAS:
1. A decision has
been
made by the government
of Canada to arm the officers of the Canada Border Services Agency
(CBSA);
2.
The CCR
has raised its concerns to the
Prime Minister in this regard;
3.
Arming
CBSA is absolutely unnecessary with
negative impacts on refugees who have gone through persecution, mental
trauma
and torture;
THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR oppose the arming of CBSA and advocate to
overturn
the decision.
10.
Exclusion of claimants at the POE
WHEREAS:
1. There have been
many
documented cases
where CBSA officers at the Port Of Entry (POE) have issued removal
orders
against people seeking refugee protection in Canada before they were
able to
state their intent to claim refugee status;
2. The
consequence of this is to deprive a
claimant of access to the Immigration and Refugee Board;
3. There
is
no stay of removal pending an
application for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) once a removal
order has
been issued;
4. As
a
result there are documented cases of
people being removed without any risk assessment;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CCR call on the government
to issue regulations or guidelines that would require POE officers to
ask
persons subject to removal if they fear persecution in their country of
origin
or of habitual residence before issuing a removal order.