14 October 2005
Montreal.
The Canadian Council for Refugees and Amnesty International call on the
Canadian government to respect the rights of refugees and the will of
Parliament, by implementing the refugee appeal. Ten
months to the day since a Parliamentary committee called on
the Minister to act, the government’s lack of response outrages all
those
concerned for refugee rights.
“For
the past three and a half years, by not implementing the appeal the
government
has disregarded the clear and unequivocal will of Parliament, as
expressed in
the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act duly passed
through
the democratic process,” said Nick Summers, President of the Canadian
Council
for Refugees (CCR). “Adding insult to
injury, the government has attempted to string us along with a series
of broken
promises and misrepresentations.”
The
story of broken promises and misrepresentations includes the following:
·
November
2001: Royal assent is given to the Immigration and Refugee
Protection Act,
containing an appeal for refugees.
o
April
2002: Minister Coderre announces that implementation of the refugee
appeal is
delayed.
·
May
2002: Minister Coderre announces to the CCR that the appeal will be
implemented
within a year. (He confirms the commitment in the House of Commons, 6
June
2002)
o
Over
three years later, the appeal has not been implemented.
·
April
2002: The delay in implementation of the appeal is explained by
reference to
“an unprecedented increase in refugee claims”.
(CIC news release, 29 April 2002)
o
January
2003: The figures for 2002 show a dramatic decrease in the number of
claims.
·
February
2003: The delay in implementation is explained by reference to the
IRB’s
“inventory” [i.e. claims waiting to be heard] which remains “very high”
(50,000). (Letter from Hon. Denis
Coderre to CCR, 11 February 2003)
o
June
2005: The IRB “inventory” is 22,000, the lowest it has been in the last
decade.
·
December
2002: Minister Coderre says that he is “committed to developing viable
options
for an effective appeal process in relation to refugee claims. My officials are currently identifying and
evaluating possible procedures in this regard.” (Letter to CCR, 5 Dec.
2002). All subsequent Ministers make
similar references to studying alternatives.
o
No
proposals have ever been tabled.
·
December
2004: The Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration unanimously
passes
a resolution calling for the Minister to
“implement the Refugee Appeal Division or advise the Committee as to an
alternative proposal without delay.”
o
Ten
months later, no response has been received from the Minister.
“The
absence of an appeal on the merits has been recognized as a fundamental
flaw in
the Canadian refugee determination system by both the Inter-American
Commission
on Human Rights and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees,” said Gloria
Nafziger, Refugee Coordinator, Amnesty International Canada.
See also the CCR report: The
Refugee Appeal: Is no one listening?, 31
March 2005 at http://www.ccrweb.ca/refugeeappeal.pdf