Statement in response to 2003 Report of the Auditor General of Canada, Chapter 5 Citizenship and Immigration Canada - Control and Enforcement
15 April 2003
Statement in response to 2003 Report of the Auditor General of Canada, Chapter 5 Citizenship and Immigration Canada - Control and Enforcement
15 April 2003
Introduction
In April 2003 the Auditor General of Canada submitted its report to
the House of Commons. Chapter 5 of the report addresses immigration
control and enforcement functions. The Canadian Council for Refugees
understands the particular role of the Auditor General in assessing government
performance, but nevertheless considers that the audit is weakened by the
narrow and one-sided approach to measuring the effectiveness of enforcement
and control measures. This has contributed to misleading coverage
in the media. Because it is so far removed from the human context
of detention and removals, the audit fails to assess the cost of unnecessary
enforcement activities, both on the people affected and the Canadian taxpayer.
The audit therefore contributes to the myth of Canada as a country that
hardly ever enforces its immigration laws, while never addressing the realities
of the people detained for months on flimsy grounds, deported to situations
of risk, interdicted and sent back to persecution or living lives of fear
and deprivation because they are under threat of deportation.
Extent of enforcement activities
Coverage of the report in the media gives the impression that the immigration
legislation is hardly enforced at all. This is a false picture.
The people questioned, detained and deported by Citizenship and Immigration
Canada every day can testify that enforcement activities are very present
and affect many people's lives. Thousands of people with uncertain
status in Canada live in daily fear that their turn will be next, knowing
that immigration enforcement is a reality.
Enforcement abuses
The Auditor General's report makes no attempt to assess the quality
of enforcement activities, from the point of view of those against whom
the enforcement activities are exercised. No attention is paid to
the allegations of racism and of abuse of power by some immigration enforcement
officers. This lack is particularly noticeable given past history,
including the 1996 study by Roger Tassé on removals, commissioned
by CIC after it became known that an official had committed forgery to
facilitate removals. The study recommended improved accountability
measures and more attention to ethical issues. There is still no
independent complaints mechanism available to people who feel that they
have been mistreated by immigration enforcement officials.
Consequences of being without status in Canada
The Auditor General is quoted in the media as asking, "Why would people
go through the procedure of trying to arrive legally in this country, if
they can come in illegally and there's no consequence?" In fact,
people without status in Canada face very serious consequences every day
of their lives, because they have virtually no rights in Canada.
They have great difficulty getting access to basic services such as health
care. They are vulnerable to exploitation by employers and others.
They have no social safety net. Virtually all avenues to improvement
of their lives through education or professional development are closed
to them.
Unnecessary detention
The Auditor General's report looks at detention, but fails to ask whether
CIC is unnecessarily detaining some people, at considerable expense to
the taxpayer. Many Canadians might wonder what the point is of keeping
a woman in detention while she gives birth, or detaining children (even
in at least one case, sending guards to detain a hospitalized child).
Some detainees spend months and years in detention, without being removed.
Refugee claimants who are detained because they lack identity documents
remain in detention even after they have produced ID because they are unable
to come up with money for a bond.
Questionable interventions
The Auditor General also neglects to ask whether CIC is using its enforcement
resources effectively in interventions in refugee claims being heard by
the Immigration and Refugee Board. While some CIC interventions are necessary
to ensure that relevant information is considered, other interventions
add nothing to the process except extra delays. Given the existing
backlog of refugee claims at the IRB and the shortage of resources at CIC,
unhelpful interventions at the IRB are doubly costly.
Impact of interdicting refugees
The Auditor General expresses satisfaction with Canada's overseas interdiction
efforts, which prevent "improperly documented travellers" from getting
to Canada. She does not stop to ask what happens to those who are
interdicted if they are refugees fleeing persecution. In some cases,
interdiction leads to refugees being jailed in the country where they are
interdicted or sent back to the country where they face persecution, without
ever being given a chance to make a refugee claim.
Priorities for funding
Citizenship and Immigration Canada would no doubt like to have resources
for enforcement activities. But more resources are desperately needed
in other areas too. People trying to reunite with close family members
are facing long delays because there are not enough visa officers available.
Refugees waiting for resettlement in Canada are also being pushed aside.
CIC is even suggesting that refugees may have to pay for their own processing,
because CIC can't afford to meet the government's commitment towards resettling
refugees.
Backlogs in all directions: does CIC need more work?
It appears that almost every facet of CIC work is bogged down with
backlogs, despite extra resources allocated in the wake of September 11:
there are backlogs in processing family reunification, overseas refugee
applications, skilled workers as well applications for humanitarian and
compassionate considerations. It is therefore all the more strange
that the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration should be proposing to
Cabinet, as reported in the media, that CIC take on responsibility for
the refugee determinations currently done by the IRB. It hardly seems
that CIC is well-positioned to take on any more work.
Resolving the situation of people without status
Talking about thousands of people being "illegally in Canada" conceals
the human face behind the numbers. Many of them have in fact done
nothing illegal. They may be refugee families who have been wrongly
refused refugee status, with no recourse because the government has not
implemented the appeal for refugees. They may not be removable because
they come from a country at war or so disrupted that the Minister has temporarily
suspended removals. They may be women who have been trafficked into
Canada and who are effectively being held in slavery in Canada. They
may be people who would be willing to return to their own country, but
they do not have the means to do so, and CIC offers them no assistance
with voluntary return. They may be people who are contributing positively
to the Canadian economy and society. They may be people who are here
because their family is in Canada.
Canada stands to gain more by investing in programs to regularize people's status than by spending more money deporting them.
********************
The Auditor General report can be found at:
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/03menu_e.html
et en français au:
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/rapports.nsf/html/03menu_f.html